Re: Design by Contract
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Mon, 02 Mar 2015 07:20:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Design by Contract | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84147@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Yasuo,
It may be to late for 7.0.
Also Alexander liked to to add another proposal, but I saw only
pre-required one(s)
Anyway, it's not a big problem to vote now.
I may take care about implementation for https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2 (but
only if it wins).
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I made vote only RFC and started discussion for voting
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce_design_by_contract
> Please feel free to correct/improve it.
>
> I added note to our RFCs
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc
> ---
> This RFC is part of “Design by Contract Introduction” RFC
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce_design_by_contract
> There is alternative implementation proposal by “Definition”
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2
> ----
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2
> ----
> This RFC is part of “Design by Contract Introduction” RFC
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/introduce_design_by_contract
> This RFC is an alternative approach to “Native DbC support” RFC.
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc
> ----
>
> I understand there are things to resolve, but RFCs are good enough to
> start discussions. I'll post discussion mail shortly. If you find anything,
> have any comments or any show stopper, please let me know.
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohgaki@ohgaki.net
>
>