Re: Design by Contract

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > >> It may be to late for 7.0. >> > > I feel the same way. It may be better to try add it with 7.x. > > >> Also Alexander liked to to add another proposal, but I saw only >> pre-required one(s) >> Anyway, it's not a big problem to vote now. >> I may take care about implementation for >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dbc2 >> (but only if it wins). > > > Thank you. > The proposal would not break existing code as it does not reserve new > keywords. > We may try to add later on. Assert only DbC is messy and harder to > maintain, > but it's good start. > assert() is not for DbC. It''s useful by it's own. However, new zero-cost assert() implementation should be reused for true DbC. Thanks. Dmitry. > > Regards, > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohgaki@ohgaki.net > >