RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [INFO] Basic Scalar Types
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:23:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [INFO] Basic Scalar Types | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84901@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Sorry, but ... even though your original RFC was very unclear about this,
> everybody went by the "all votes must start by the 15th" interpretation
> that
> has been discussed in that thread. Do you think it's an accident that a
> whopping six RFC votes started today? It isn't.
>
>
> Please don't start reinterpreting things to fit your needs. I am
> personally
> totally fine with extending the PHP 7 timeline by say one month - but if
> we do
> that, let's make it official and applying to everyone, not just some
> particular
> RFC. I know for sure that there are a number of additional RFCs that would
> have been submitted for PHP 7 had anyone known that it'll be allowed.
First off, this is Bob's interpretation which he brought up on Friday. Yes,
ideally I would have read the original text during the discussion period and
commented on it, but I didn't. I think the 3 month period for
implementation (that's mostly done) and testing gives a very reasonable time
period to absorb the most lax of interpretations.
I think it would be a shame to delay the timeline for this, but I also think
it would be a shame for the timeline - that was *clearly* not designed to
create de-facto bias towards one RFC or the other - to do exactly that.
Even if we were to push the timeline out by a bit, how do we do it? An RFC
with a minimum discussion period of two weeks and another week for a vote?
That kind of defeats the purpose. A gentlemen's agreement? Something else?
Zeev