AW: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities
| From: | Robert Stoll | Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:53:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | AW: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84911@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Matthew Leverton [mailto:leverton@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. März 2015 20:46
> An: Anthony Ferrara
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting irregularities
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I ran some numbers on the current votes of the dual-mode vote right
> > now. There were a number of voters that I didn't recognize. So I
> > decided to pull some stats.
> >
> ...
> >
> > Something that I think we need to discuss as a group.
> >
> > So consider that discussion open.
> >
> I think this is likely because the votes are made public during voting phase. To me, that is a
> bad thing. It makes for an ugly
> voting period.
> That sort of politics should happen during the discussion phase.
>
> So I don't think there's anything wrong with "first time voters"
> voting No en masse here. I just think there's a major problem in having a real-time count
> of votes during the voting period.
>
> If votes weren't made public during the voting, then more people would vote on more
> issues... avoiding this situation
> where people come from "nowhere" to cast a vote as word gets out on blogs that
> something terrible is about to happen.
>
> In short, I think the real-time public vote results causes a few problems:
>
> 1) Bandwagon voting, or "vote for the winner" mindset. The early wave of voters can
> impact the results by discouraging
> people from voting.
> (Look at Zeev's RFC vote count vs Anthony's.)
> 2) The losing side feverishly drumming up votes, often with scare tactics - i.e., vocal
> minority. (It's much easier for the "No"
> side of any vote to appeal to this.)
> 3) In rare cases, Gaming the system - closing the vote at the exact time that benefits the
> owner of the RFC.
>
> So I don't think there's anything sinister here. It's just the natural result of
> the voting rules.
>
> --
> Matthew Leverton
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I agree with Matthew here, the voting process should be revised and votes should not be public --
for anyone -- until closed. I mean, every sane democratic country is using the secret ballot method,
why shouldn't PHP use it?
But I am not a voter, so just my 2 cents
Cheers, Robert