Re: Proposal to delay 7.0 timeline
| From: | Benoit Schildknecht | Date: | Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:09:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to delay 7.0 timeline | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-85385@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:44:23 +0100, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> a écrit:
On Mar 21, 2015 11:55 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote:Same here, very bad ideaSent from my mobileOn 21 במרץ 2015, at 18:05, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:delay 7.0himselfOn 03/21/2015 08:52 AM, François Laupretre wrote: Now, after more calls from many of you to delay it, and as Zeevseemed to consider it as more acceptable, I am proposing again tostarting). Ifeature freeze to May, 15 (2 month delay, date where vote isitsummarize,won’t repeat all the arguments of my previous posts but, toversion.would allow to include important features, making it a ‘real’ majorneedReleasing a major version is not just a question of BC break, we alsohaveto think about what we put forward. So, we need features. We alreadyhaveSTH, but we can do more (I personally have at least 4 RFCs I didn’tNo, please, let's get what we have stabilized and out the door. There are always more things to do and we can delay things indefinitely.time for, including scalar pseudo-methods, which can be an important feature).And Icompletely disagree that this isn't a 'real' major version.+1Same.Zeev