Re: New RFC draft "static class constructor"

On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 17:23 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > Why am I saying it makes the language more complex? - Your proposal > seems to miss mentioning when exactly the method is executed. what is Ah, I missed this Trigger for “magic” method call: First call to class, either first call to __construct(...) or first call to any public or protected static method or property of the class Which means adding a flag, which has to be checked on every method call or other access to *any* class and leads to completely "random" (from perspective of average user) behavior while this feature can't be used for an "obvious" task like registering itself as plugin into some registry. -1 johannes

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc