Re: New RFC draft "static class constructor"
| From: | Johannes Schlüter | Date: | Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:30:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New RFC draft "static class constructor" | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-85794@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 21:14 +0200, Johannes Ott wrote:
> The obvious task is to initial the state of the class before usage as I
> wrote inside my introduction of the RFC.
That is one possible task users are going to try doing. Users are more
creative.
> I think there is no "random" behavior (not more then other so called
> "magic" methods). But I see that I forgot this point in the discussion
> part because we already had this point on the prediscussion. Will add
> this tomorrow, with my exact answer to this point,
It is "random" in the sense that a seemingly unrelated change somewhere
in an application changes order in other places, too.
johannes
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc