Re: Re: Move internals discussion to a better medium

On 2 August 2015 15:26:00 BST, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote: >2015-08-02 15:29 GMT+02:00 Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>: > >> On 2 August 2015 13:54:46 BST, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote: >> >We're discussing issues here, so what's wrong with an issue tracker? >> >> No, we're discussing every aspect of the project, from release >management >> to personal introductions. > > >Release management, RFCs and other things totally fit something I'd >call >issue. See one of my other replies for more categories of content, which don't feel like a good fit for issues, which in my mind is for finite work flows like raise-discuss-assign-close... >Personal introductions are a valid point, they're nothing I'd do with >issues, that's something that fits here. [...] >TBH, it's not just about communication on the mailing list here. PHP's >bug >tracker is a real PITA, at least for users without a php.net account. So perhaps rather than replacing Internals, it's a question of finding a nicer issue tracker (fuller featured than either GitHub or bugs.php.net), making better use of it, and defining what things should be in it and what should stay in a more open discussion forum like this list?