Re: Native Annotation Syntax

Levi, I was asking about the reasons it was rejected. While researching, I found the original RFC was voted with 123 votes (71% approval), and yet was marked as 'declined'. I didn't know why, couldn't find why, so I figured I'd ask (as it strikes me as a major feature that's missing). 2015-11-26 15:11 GMT-02:00 Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> > wrote: > > guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote on 26/11/2015 16:05: > >> > >> Ok then. I'll pretend that lack of interest didn't happen many other > >> situations (like http://marc.info/?t=144608767800001) > >> and move on. > > > > > > It's possible that a lot of the core devs are still concentrating on > getting > > the changes in 7.0 bedded in, and have more time to discuss features for > 7.1 > > in a month or two. > > At least a few are working on features of their own. > > I am curious – a quick scan of this thread didn't seem to actually > propose anything new. It's just discussion about same RFC that was > already rejected. Correct? > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >