Re: protected __call() question
| From: | Jochem Maas | Date: | Thu, 08 Apr 2004 02:09:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: protected __call() question | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-8978@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Apr 7, 2004, at 9:28 PM, Jochem Maas wrote:which I don't want to (not sure right now what its set to.), and I agree with you, PPP is a very nice addition to PHP. I realise the suggestion was hacky but I was thinking more in terms of pre-empting a barrage of support emails I'm happy to just remove the P and add it again if ever that becomes an option. Thanks to everyone for your feedback. rgds, Jochemmaybe its possible for the parser to ignore public/private/protected declarations on __call() (& also __set(), __get()) methods, given PHP forgiving nature/image (at least that is my impression).The whole point of PPP is to not be forgiving or permissive unless you instruct the engine to do so.