Re: Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct
| From: | Lester Caine | Date: | Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:50:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-90909@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 25/01/16 05:23, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> For me, if people would use CoC to count how many times they sent a
> message on the list and then start arguing about *that* instead of the
> actual matter, then we made things worse, not better. The thought that
> somebody can be banned from discussion solely because they sent extra
> email per hour, or repeated an argument, makes me cringe. We certainly
> do not need anything like that here.
As someone who acknowledges that they perhaps send duplicate messages
when something irritates them, I think I can associate with that
statement. Slightly in defence, I would say that this is where the
debate between 'forum' and 'mail list' probably comes into play as to be
honest, I forget sometimes what has been said and am often replying to
the current quotes rather than reviewing the whole thread. Having the
whole thread on a forum would do nothing to solve that problem as with a
long debate you still only see a few messages but at least on my local
email archive I can scan back and now am to see just what I did say
before. That people fail to follow the etiquette set down to help make
the list more readable is probably a good example of why rules will get
broken anyway? I am now monitoring just what *I* have posted to a
thread, something which can't be done so easily on-line?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk