Re: Re: [RFC Discussion] "var" Deprecation

On 10/03/16 17:16, Colin O'Dell wrote: > - Ensuring that all major arguments for & against have been documented. While the no-brain conversion of one to the other may be acceptable to some, it's both the follow though on associated documentation and a proper review of the code which is CURRENTLY the reason that the code has not yet been converted. I have no problem with code needing to be updated, it's the unnecessary pressure that it has to be done now when there is no gain currently from spending that time. There are other areas of code review that would be more productive, and new libraries replacing the older code may be a more productive way forward than having to address code that is currently doing the job. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk