Re: [RFC Discussion] "var" Deprecation

Den 2016-03-14 kl. 19:14, skrev Colin O'Dell:

Forcing people to specify a visibility for properties and not for methods would add yet another inconsistency in the language.

That's a really good point. However, I think we currently have a different inconsistency: declaring functions without explicit visibility is possible without needing an extra (and redundant) keyword. The inconsistency you mention could easily be solved by a future RFC. We could: 1. Require visibility for class methods. 2. Allow declaring properties without using any keywords. 3. Use some other approach? I don't think we necessarily need to choose an option at this time (or perhaps ever). Interesting :) Think option 1 implies a BC break. Would it also affects interface

declarations making public keyword mandatory? Personally I like option 2, but feels a bit beyond the scope of this RFC. Regards //Björn