Re: [RFC] Libsodium (bump)
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:02:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Libsodium (bump) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-91684@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Scott,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com> wrote:
> Question: If this extension is adopted, which syntax would you prefer?
>
> \Sodium\func()
> Sodium::func()
> sodium_func()
I prefer both of
Sodium::func()
sodium_func()
IMO, we are better to provide both OO and procedural API which have
identical features. i.e. I prefer multi paradigm programming language.
It would be natural for PHP since PHP was born as procedural language
and evolving as OO.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net