Re: [RFC] Libsodium (bump)
| From: | Scott Arciszewski | Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2016 01:56:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Libsodium (bump) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-91689@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Noted and agreed.
On Mar 15, 2016 9:56 PM, "David Zuelke" <dz@heroku.com> wrote:
> I think I've said this before; please call it ext-sodium, not
> ext-libsodium.
>
> David
>
>
> > On 15.03.2016, at 18:40, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com> wrote:
> >
> > Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium
> >
> > I'd like to bump the RFC to make Libsodium a core extension, as per
> > Ferenc's suggestion on the mcrypt RFC.
> >
> > Question: If this extension is adopted, which syntax would you prefer?
> >
> > \Sodium\func()
> > Sodium::func()
> > sodium_func()
> >
> > As it currently stands, the PHP extension in PECL uses a namespace +
> > function format.
> >
> > Scott Arciszewski
> > Chief Development Officer
> > Paragon Initiative Enterprises
> > <https://paragonie.com>
>
>