Re: [RFC Discussion] Typed Properties

On 19/03/16 10:23, Fleshgrinder wrote: > Properties need the ability to be void even after construction and it is > up to the object to keep track and ensure state. Nullability is imho not > necessary at all. So we are all in line here. If the record I am working with identifies elements are incorrectly matched, then making a value 'void' is the correct action. We would just NULL that identifier and fire off a delete to the linked record in the database. Otherwise we have to create additional logic to handle that. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk