Re: [RFC][Discussion] Add session_gc()
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:26:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][Discussion] Add session_gc() | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92392@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Stas,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All of PHP users _should_ avoid probability based GC
>> whenever it is possible. Why we shouldn't have API that kills
>> custom of probability based usage?
>
> No, they shouldn't. Just claiming that your favorite use case should fit
> everybody does not make it so.
What's the rationale behind your opinion?
I don't see reasonable/logical reasoning.
Probability based GC is unreliable and can reactivate very old sessions
without "Precise session management RFC" and you opposed the RFC.
Reactivating obsoleted/should be deleted session is wrong simply.
Why users shouldn't matter?
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net