Re: [RFC] [VOTE] PHP Attributes
| From: | Björn Larsson | Date: | Tue, 10 May 2016 22:09:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] PHP Attributes | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-93176@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Den 2016-05-11 kl. 00:00, skrev Dmitry Stogov:
On 05/11/2016 12:29 AM, Björn Larsson wrote:Thats a fair point, so Annotation it's not. Still, when I hear PHP attributes I associate it with class / function attributes. Maybe just a question getting used to the naming. Hm, wonder if PHP directives could have been an option? Regards //BjörnDen 2016-05-10 kl. 20:29, skrev Dmitry Stogov:The more I listen to arguments of adepts of existing PHP annotation systems, the more I think, that "PHP attributes" is the right name for this proposal. This feature is not just for PHP annotation systems.Hi internals, I've started voting on "PHP Attributes" RFC. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes In my opinion, "PHP Attributes" might be a smart tool for PHP extension, but it's not going to be the end of the world, if we decided to live with doc-comments only. Thanks. Dmitry.Thanks for the good work. Regarding naming, I googled "PHP attributes" vs "PHP annotations" and looking at the result, my view is that that Annotation is a better naming then Attributes. Any hope in changing it?