Re: [RFC] [VOTE] PHP Attributes
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Wed, 11 May 2016 05:26:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] PHP Attributes | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-93200@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Joe,
The sense in native support for AST is questionable.
On one hand this allows syntax verification.
On the other hand simple string may be parsed into AST with just one additional call to
ast\compile_string().
Thanks. Dmitry.
________________________________
From: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:46:09 AM
To: Björn Larsson
Cc: Dmitry Stogov; PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] PHP Attributes
Morning Dmitry,
I'm not really happy with the voting options here.
I would not vote in favour of a patch that does not include support for AST, that's a
completely different feature.
As it is, I have to vote yes in favour of AST, but it may be counted as a vote in favour of
attributes without AST ...
This doesn't seem right ... I don't want attributes without AST, and there is no
voting option to reflect that.
Cheers
Joe
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Björn Larsson <bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com<mailto:bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com>> wrote:
Den 2016-05-11 kl. 00:00, skrev Dmitry Stogov:
On 05/11/2016 12:29 AM, Björn Larsson wrote:
Den 2016-05-10 kl. 20:29, skrev Dmitry Stogov:
Hi internals,
I've started voting on "PHP Attributes" RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes
In my opinion, "PHP Attributes" might be a smart tool for PHP extension, but it's not
going to be the end of the world, if we decided to live with doc-comments only.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Thanks for the good work. Regarding naming, I googled
"PHP attributes" vs "PHP annotations" and looking at the
result, my view is that that Annotation is a better naming
then Attributes. Any hope in changing it?
The more I listen to arguments of adepts of existing PHP annotation systems, the more I think, that
"PHP attributes" is the right name for this proposal.
This feature is not just for PHP annotation systems.
Thats a fair point, so Annotation it's not. Still, when I hear PHP
attributes I associate it with class / function attributes. Maybe
just a question getting used to the naming. Hm, wonder if PHP
directives could have been an option?
Regards //Björn
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php