Re: [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties

Woops, no it isn't ... the property is private ... Cheers Joe On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org> wrote: > That's a bug ... that should throw ... > > Cheers > Joe > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Am 10.06.2016 um 16:00 schrieb Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>: >> >> 2016-06-10 15:50 GMT+02:00 Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>: >> >>> >>> Am 10.6.2016 um 15:34 schrieb Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>: >>> >>> >>> Top-posting, since I'm taking off now. >>> >>> From outside the class, properties are not visible at all, so their types >>> are un-important from outer scopes. >>> >>> echo $foo->bar; is not the same in instance method body or outside of the >>> class. >>> >>> From outside it works just fine and doesn't throw: >>> https://3v4l.org/L8CqF/rfc#rfc-typed_properties >>> >>> >>> This is an intermittent bug in the implementation. >>> the RFC is explicitly mentioning that it should throw and throwing also >>> is the correct behavior here. >>> >> >> I don't think this is and should be a bug. I think it is the right >> behavior if we choose to throw at all. >> >> >> In this case a definite -1 on the RFC from me. I don't want "surprises" >> regarding the type if a property is declared to return a certain type. >> >> Bob >> > >