Re: Is the "No BC Breaks in Minor Releases" policy enforceable?
| From: | Rowan Collins | Date: | Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:25:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Is the "No BC Breaks in Minor Releases" policy enforceable? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-93925@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 12/06/2016 22:04, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
On 12 June 2016 at 17:42, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote:Sure, but if we are changing the decision of that RFC, we should at least say so. Simply acting contrary to the agreed policy is not the same as changing that policy. Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]- We have an RFC [too_few_args] about to pass that seems to break our published Release Process.The "Release Process" is an RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess There are no rules against a new RFC changing the decision from a previous RFC.