Re: Is the "No BC Breaks in Minor Releases" policy enforceable?

From: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:13:22 +0000
Subject: Re: Is the "No BC Breaks in Minor Releases" policy enforceable?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-94052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> I didn't necessarily mean the currently proposed; I mean more > generally. For instance Nullable Types and the associated > ReflectionType changes both have small BC breaks that I don't mind. In > the case of the former there is a long-standing bug that did have BC > break impact that was fixed. This passed 44 to 1. Stas was the no-vote > and he can clarify his stance but I do not believe he voted no because > of the BC break. Correction; 44 to 2. The other vote was Bwoebi's and he would prefer full union types.

« previous php.internals (#94052) next »