Re: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Session ID without hashing

Hi! > I missed to remove the related lines in RFC. I marked the line by <del>. > I don't mind reopen the vote few days. Any objections? > If no objections, I'll reopen vote few days. We already had a vote, at it was completed. Having another vote on the same subject, slightly modified, is highly irregular and contrary to voting RFC, which mandates 6 month period or *substantial* changes (with assumed new discussion period I imagine, since past discussion can't really count for substantially changed proposal) to schedule a new vote on a rejected proposal. This also gives pretty bad example - on failed vote, tweak a little issue and issue immediate revote, repeat until one of the votes succeeds. I understand that this is not at all your intent here, but it's the pattern that we do not want to enable. I voted yes for it, and it is a pity that it failed, as it seems, because of a miscommunication (maybe not, I don't know), but going against our own agreed process I think is not a good outcome either. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com