Re: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Session ID without hashing

Hi Yasuo, On Jul 24, 2016 10:51 AM, "Yasuo Ohgaki" <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Changing the RFC during voting requires a _restart_ not an extension. > >> The vote must be re-run. I will not put this in 7.1 without a new vote. > > > > OK, looks like I was underestimating the magnitude of the messiness that > > this change (or lack of it) brought to a vote. Let's re-run the vote > > then, I think that would be the best solution given the confusion that > > apparently happened. > > I'll open reopen the vote a week. > Is this too long? > No it is not. Sadly I did not follow up on that when I said the vote should start again. The idea of a minimum voting period is not an option but a must. We introduced it in the relase process rfc, as well as the minimum discussion time, to be sure everyone has a chance to voice out and vote. We have been a bit too tolerant lately (like "as this is a small change I only setup one week discussion"). This must not happen. It is not about the content of a rfc but the time available for contributors to act. And all contributors do not follow the RFCs daily. Cheers Pierre