Re: [RFC][VOTE] E_WARNING on invalid container read-adccess
| From: | David Walker | Date: | Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:16:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][VOTE] E_WARNING on invalid container read-adccess | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-95240@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Will up the ante: I wasn't sure the RFC page on voting didn't really define
this, I have no probs with 2/3.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:13 AM Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 16 Aug 2016, at 16:55, David Walker <dave@mudsite.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd like to go ahead and open up the RFC to voting to the scope
>> > that it is written.
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Although I will almost certainly be voting yes, the vote does need 2/3's
>> to pass.
>>
>> All language changes require that, even if no syntax is changed.
>>
>> cheers
>> Dan
>> Ack
>>
> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
> While "language change" is not well-defined I agree that the vote needs to
> be 2/3 here.
>