Re: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Add validation functions to filter module
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:16:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Add validation functions to filter module | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-95245@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 16.08.2016 at 08:42, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
>>> Yasuo (who Dan quoted here) refers to completely invalid input, such as
>>> invalid UTF-8 byte sequences. I think, that in this case the app should
>>> bail out without even given detailed information, as such grossly
>>> invalid input most likely is an attempt to attack (or a severe browser bug).
>>
>> I personally am not a big fan of "bail out without giving information",
>> unless that information somehow crosses security boundary (e.g.
>> displaying PHP error messages in production) or reveals unnecessary info
>> (this part is super-tricky in crypto, but ouside of crypto common sense
>> is usually not a bad guide).
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Now, how much easier your life would be if you app would just report
>> "invalid UTF-8 sequence encountered in parameter FirstName" before
>> bailing out? How many hours, pulled out hairs and 4am sessions would it
>> save? I think it's worth considering.
>
> I once introduced a check erroring with "Malformed UTF-8 detected" to a
> CMS. Until that was changed to "Bad request. Please <a href=".">try
> again</a>.", we got a lot of support requests from confused users who
> had bookmarked URLs with ISO-8859-* query strings. Even pointing out
> which parameter was the culprit, wouldn't have changed that, I presume.
>
> Of course, it makes sense to *log* very detailed information in this
> case (amongst others, the byte sequence that was malformed), but
> presenting them to visitors doesn't seem to be helpful – most of these
> wouldn't even know what UTF-8 is.
Excellent example of input validation exception!
Software has history, therefore certain validation cannot be done automatically.
For the record, many security standards/guides require to "Canonicalize"
input data _before_ input validation. If anyone would like to validate
"String", canonicalize first.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net