Re: [RFC][VOTE] Add validation functions to filter module

On 07/09/16 10:19, Lester Caine wrote: > If the definition of a variable is > improved to include ALL of the validation we ideally need and I include > setStrict(int) in that then at run time we can both validate input and > decide on the error model that is applied. And I know I will get my head chewed of for combining threads, but readOnly(); Seems to me the correct answer to the whole of the 'immutable' debate. The class simply creates a readOnly object, validated against all the rules and stores it as a readOnly object. No reason you can't simply call the class again and create a separate object. But this is where my 'model' of the world is an associative array set of data handled by a separate set of code. If you need 100 read only dates for a calendar you only need one set of code to generate them. The created objects would all be validated against the date rules and then locked so you can't modify them. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk