Re: [RFC][VOTE] Deprecate then Remove Mcrypt Closed (23-6)
| From: | Davey Shafik | Date: | Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:24:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][VOTE] Deprecate then Remove Mcrypt Closed (23-6) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-95576@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
That would be why I thought it hadn't been missed!
Thanks Scott (and Christoph :)
- Davey
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>
wrote:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1996
>
> Scott Arciszewski
> Chief Development Officer
> Paragon Initiative Enterprises <https://paragonie.com>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I thought someone beat me to it?
>>
>> Scott Arciszewski
>> Chief Development Officer
>> Paragon Initiative Enterprises <¶…C«vW‘¯@QÌö/
>> https://paragonie.com>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Davey Shafik <davey@php.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I would still be OK adding this in RC2, TBH. I didn't realize it was
>>> missed, and it's something we _need_ to do.
>>>
>>> - Davey
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Leigh <leight@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22 March 2016 at 17:00, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mcrypt-viking-funeral
>>>> >
>>>> > The tally of closing (2016-03-22T17:00:00) is 23 Yes, 6 No. This is a
>>>> 79.3%
>>>> > favorable response, which exceeds the 2/3 majority by a significant
>>>> margin.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks to everyone who voted or participated in this discussion.
>>>> >
>>>> > I've heard and respect some of the objections raised by folks who
>>>> voted No,
>>>> > but moving this liability out of the core into PECL as soon as
>>>> possible is
>>>> > not only a good move for the security of PHP applications, but now we
>>>> know
>>>> > it's the choice the community wants.
>>>> >
>>>> > As promised, I'll get the E_DEPRECATED patch written soon.
>>>>
>>>> As we're now at RC1, I assume it is too late to push forward with this?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>