Re: [RFC] Abolish 50%+1 Votes

Afternoon Niklas, I made an off-by-one error in an RFC. Thanks for captioning my pain. Cheers Joe On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote: > 2016-11-17 18:18 GMT+01:00 Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>: > >> Afternoon internals, >> >> This has been discussed before in various RFC threads, there does seem to >> be some consensus that 50%+1 votes could be harmful. >> >> To what degree, I am not sure. >> >> I raise for discussion the topic of abolishing 50%+1 votes, and requiring >> all changes regardless of their nature to pass by a super majority of >> 2/3+1. >> >> Please read the (brief) RFC and raise objections here. >> >> There will be a one week discussion period for this RFC. >> >> Cheers >> Joe >> > > What's the reason for 2/3+1 instead of 2/3? Currently we have 50%+1 or > 2/3, but not 2/3+1 as 2/3 is already a majority. > > Regards, Niklas >