Re: function registration patch
| From: | Sterling Hughes | Date: | Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:58:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: function registration patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-98@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 17:10, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> > Don't do that. :)
> >
> > The other problem is (besides what derick said) with Ze2 it is not
> > assured that accesses will be lowercased, that's an optional thing. One
> > can overload classes, and be CS (I do it with ext/mono).
>
> I realize that I can overload get_constructor and get_method handlers
> and do all that stuff. But, seriously, this is screwed up. Given the
> situation where class is "GtkButton", if I specify constructor all
> lowercased, it won't be called at all! If I make it the same as the
> class name, then "parent::GtkButton" stuff stops working. Something must
> be done.
You're missing my point. Your patch doesn't allow for one to use
get_constructor and get_method handlers to implement case-sensitive
handlers, as you are lowercasing the stuff on insert, the patch is
limiting.
I think the best solution is just to play nice with the engine, register
it as "gtkbutton" or "__constructor" in the code itself. Then, add an
introspection callback to the engine, which can handle all the accesses
to function tables, etc.
-Sterling
> -Andrei
> http://www.gravitonic.com/
>
> "Everything is a matter of a little programming" -- Rasmus Lerdorf
--
--
"That stuff's easy compared to installing horde :)"
- Alan Knowles, In response to my applause for creating a LALR
parser for PHP.