Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2
| From: | Scott Arciszewski | Date: | Fri, 03 Feb 2017 23:54:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-98155@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> Hi Scott and all,
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've opened the vote for the libsodium RFC.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium
>>
>> See https://externals.io/thread/626 for the previous
>> discussion topics.
>>
>> The vote closes at 21:00 UTC (4 PM Eastern Time) next Friday.
>>
>
> I voted for "No, sodium_foo" syntax in order to be consistent with
> existing procedural APIs.
> 2/3 majority wouldn't fit nicely. What it would be if vote result is 51%
> vs 49%?
> More than half is good enough for 2nd vote choice. IMO.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohgaki@ohgaki.net
>
>
I like \Sodium\foo instead of sodium_foo, but it deviates from the norm.
If we're going to break the norm, we should do so on a stronger majority
than 50%+1.
Also, I thought the rules changed so *_everything_* needed 2/3 now?
Scott Arciszewski
Chief Development Officer
Paragon Initiative Enterprises <https://paragonie.com/>