Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2

From: Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 23:54:29 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Libsodium as a core extension in PHP 7.2
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-98155@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi Scott and all, > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Scott Arciszewski <scott@paragonie.com> > wrote: > >> I've opened the vote for the libsodium RFC. >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/libsodium >> >> See https://externals.io/thread/626 for the previous >> discussion topics. >> >> The vote closes at 21:00 UTC (4 PM Eastern Time) next Friday. >> > > I voted for "No, sodium_foo" syntax in order to be consistent with > existing procedural APIs. > 2/3 majority wouldn't fit nicely. What it would be if vote result is 51% > vs 49%? > More than half is good enough for 2nd vote choice. IMO. > > Regards, > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohgaki@ohgaki.net > > I like \Sodium\foo instead of sodium_foo, but it deviates from the norm.​ ​ If we're going to break the norm, we should do so on a stronger majority than 50%+1. Also, I thought the rules changed so *_everything_* needed 2/3 now?​ ​ Scott Arciszewski Chief Development Officer Paragon Initiative Enterprises <https://paragonie.com/> ​

« previous php.internals (#98155) next »