Re: [RFC][VOTE] Improved SSL / TLS constants
| From: | Niklas Keller | Date: | Mon, 05 Jun 2017 09:11:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][VOTE] Improved SSL / TLS constants | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99356@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2017-06-04 11:22 GMT+02:00 Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>:
> 2017-05-29 22:29 GMT+02:00 Anatol Belski <ab@php.net>:
>
>> Hi Niklas,
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Niklas Keller [mailto:me@kelunik.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 10:14 PM
>> > To: Anatol Belski <ab@php.net>
>> > Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>; PHP Internals
>> > <internals@lists.php.net>
>> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Improved SSL / TLS constants
>> >
>> > Hey Anatol,
>> >
>> >
>> > Niklas, I'd have yet a question about the RFC - it only deals
>> with stream
>> > wrappers, but there are indeed some other places at least in soap and
>> mysqlnd.
>> > Don't you think, the RFC and implementation should recapitulate those?
>> >
>> Yep, here you are
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/ext/soap/php_http.c#L305
>>
>> https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/ext/mysqlnd/mysqlnd_net.c#L974
>>
>> Basically it is the same story, as the old definitions are used, which
>> the RFC aims to replace. It might be consistent to have the behavior
>> synced, or at least to evaluate it. And, there might yet some places, not
>> expecting much but just to be aware.
>>
>> Regards
>
>
> Hi Anatol,
>
> I upgraded STREAM_CRYPTO_METHOD_TLS_CLIENT to be an alias
> to STREAM_CRYPTO_METHOD_TLS_ANY_CLIENT now, so that automatically
> upgrades any use of STREAM_CRYPTO_METHOD_TLS_CLIENT to use TLS 1.1 or TLS
> 1.2 if available.
>
> Regards, Niklas
>
Hey everyone,
thanks for voting! The voting has now been closed with 14 votes in favor
and 0 against.
You can see the full results on the voting page as always:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/improved-tls-constants#voting
Regards, Niklas