Re: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Arrays starting with a negative index
| From: | Davey Shafik | Date: | Mon, 12 Jun 2017 06:14:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Arrays starting with a negative index | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99495@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pedro,
It would be best to just kill the vote and start over. The proposal should
be for deprecation notice in 7.2 and implementation in 8.0 IMO — it should
be one vote, as doing both together should be the only option.
- Davey
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Pedro Magalhães <mail@pmmaga.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 AM, François Laupretre <francois@php.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am sorry you take it this way. Voting today on a feature for 8.0
> > wouldn't be ridiculous and it would make me change my vote, as most
> others.
> > Instead of nonsense, it would be a sign of maturity for the PHP project..
> It
> > would be great, IMO, to open a 'Approved for 8.0' section on the RFC page
> > now, and your RFC could proudly be the 1st one to enter it.
> >
>
> I agree with your suggestion and general sentiment so I propose to do the
> following:
>
> - The current voting widget refers to introducing the change on 7.2.
> (Will be mentioned on the RFC page)
> - Add a new voting widget for introducing the change on 8.0.
> - Extend the voting period for one more week than originally planned
> until 27/6/2017 18:00 UTC.
>
> Additionally, since some people also mentioned the difficulty in detecting
> this change, if the vote for 8.0 passes, I suggest to introduce a
> E_DEPRECATED notice where the implicit keys will change. You can see that
> implementation here:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/compare/master...pmmaga:
> negative-array-deprecated
> Would it make sense to include an extra voting widget for the introduction
> of the notice?
>
> Given that we are on the voting phase I would oppose changing anything by
> principle, but given that most of the discussion on the topic only started
> when the vote was started and what is dividing the vote is the timing, I
> think it makes sense to update the RFC in this case. Let me know what you
> think.
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro
>