RE: Second Mirror in India
| From: | Divyank Turakhia | Date: | Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:43:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: Second Mirror in India | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.mirrors |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-15736@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
It's a good idea but a second link will work better in this case.
Load balancing through the a cname entry is a DNS based solution. Any
DNS based solution would be cached at the ISP end. This would mean if
the first IP is down then the ISP would not request for the second ip
until 24 hrs (cache time expiry). Since a majority of the customers
would be coming through Vsnl (80% of the country), then these customers
will not be able to access the second server as Vsnl would have already
cached the reply for the first one. Also, all customers would come to
server 1 when this server is up as the ip would be cached, so no real
load balancing would be happening. In case of a second link there would
be a 60:40 probability of clicks as more ppl tend to click on the first
link.
If the DNS solution setup at VSNl's end was smart enough then it would
go to the second server. But, I know for a fact that their
implementation sucks ;o) (personal experience with multiple solutions
that we have implemented till date)
Warm Regards,
Divyank Turakhia
President & Director
----------------------
http://www.directi.com
----------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:d.rethans@jdimedia.nl]
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 1:52 AM
> To: Gabor Hojtsy
> Cc: php-mirrors@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: Second Mirror in India
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> > > I dont think this is a problem, right?
> >
> > No, but...
> >
> > >>We would wish to host in2.php.net on an immediate basis.
> We would be
> > >>provisioning the same on a separate server with an all-together
> > >>separate network connection to provide redundancy and at the same
> > >>time distribute load across multiple connections.
> >
> > ... we have a cname for that mirror site. So you can set up
> that name
> > to
> > balance the load to more servers while under the same name.
> This would
> > make it easier for users to get the information, as one
> link will work
> > better. So then why another name is needed?
>
> Yes, that's indeed a better idea with which I was playing myself.
>
> Derick
>
> --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Derick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl/
> JDI Media Solutions
> http://www.jdimedia.nl/
> PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals
> http://php-mag.net/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
>
>