Re: Second Mirror in India
| From: | Gabor Hojtsy | Date: | Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:13:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Second Mirror in India | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.mirrors |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-15742@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
So then, please provide the details for the in2 mirror. I guess everything except the CNAME will be the same ;) GobaIt's a good idea but a second link will work better in this case. Load balancing through the a cname entry is a DNS based solution. Any DNS based solution would be cached at the ISP end. This would mean if the first IP is down then the ISP would not request for the second ip until 24 hrs (cache time expiry).I agree, a second (in2) address is more advisable.