RE: note 31850 rejected and deleted from function.mysql-affected-rows by notes editor rioter

On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 16:38, Philip Olson wrote: > > > > Ok why was this rejected? > > > > > > It should have been deleted not rejected, someone just > > > pressed the wrong button. It adds no value as the info > > > already exists in the docs. > > > > > i'm thinking.. we don't really benefit anything extra from 'rejected' > > -- > > perhaps we should merge rejected and deleted? > > People shouldn't ask support questions or similar in the > user notes, reject has it's purpose. For example there > are people that ask a question or feature request and > wait for a reply and the rejection text leads them to the > correct place and helps future use. Delete has another > purpose, when someone posts some bogus note or the note > is integrated into the manual. And of course an email > isn't sent during deletions. > > The problem is some people use reject without knowing > what it does so this is just a small education issue. > > Regards, > Philip Philip, I am working on adding a new chapter to the documentation how-to about this. Hopefully we can refer note editing newbies :) to that ;) -- Andrew Lindeman <alindeman@php.net>