RE: note 31850 rejected and deleted from function.mysql-affected-rows by notes editor rioter

On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 16:56, Andrew Lindeman wrote: > On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 16:38, Philip Olson wrote: > > > > > Ok why was this rejected? > > > > > > > > It should have been deleted not rejected, someone just > > > > pressed the wrong button. It adds no value as the info > > > > already exists in the docs. > > > > > > > i'm thinking.. we don't really benefit anything extra from > > > 'rejected' -- > > > perhaps we should merge rejected and deleted? > > > > People shouldn't ask support questions or similar in the > > user notes, reject has it's purpose. For example there > > are people that ask a question or feature request and > > wait for a reply and the rejection text leads them to the > > correct place and helps future use. Delete has another > > purpose, when someone posts some bogus note or the note > > is integrated into the manual. And of course an email > > isn't sent during deletions. > > > > The problem is some people use reject without knowing > > what it does so this is just a small education issue. > > > > Regards, > > Philip > > Philip, I am working on adding a new chapter to the documentation how-to > about this. Hopefully we can refer note editing newbies :) to that ;) OK, I just checked it in. Criticism welcome ;) -- Andrew Lindeman <alindeman@php.net>