Re: cvs: phpweb / docs.php /include languages.inc

From: Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 17:19:26 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: phpweb / docs.php /include languages.inc
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.mirrors 
Request: Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-18398@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
There is no problem at all with having: ?>\n as the tag *includes* the newline. It's actually just wrong to leave it off.
I learned that trick from code added to php-master-web by other dev guys. :) Why this is just wrong? I thought this feature exists to prevent header() problems. I also asked Jim[?] about this, and he explained it to me, as I was curious why was that used on master.php.net.... The explanation and reasoning is probably available on the news server in some letter... So I was taught that this is good behaviour. Why it is bad??? Goba

« previous php.mirrors (#18398) next »