Re: cvs: php-bugs-web / bugtypes.inc /include functions.inc

From: Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:47:59 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: php-bugs-web / bugtypes.inc /include functions.inc
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.mirrors 
Request: Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-19012@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Well, simply cloning the current system multiple times is an even uglier hack. People are going to tweak their copies and the code will diverge so nobody will benefit from anybody else's work. -Rasmus On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: > >> jacques@php.net already emailed me that he's working on making > >> their own copy of bugs.php.net for php-gtk.. > > > >That makes very little sense to me. Why maintain N instances of the bug > >system? > > Just shows that the current system is not fit for multiple > projects. > > >Are you worried that it isn't segmented enough? A trivial > > Yes. They only have ONE category to file the bugs in, > PEAR/GTK both need several. > > >addition would be to simply key off of the Host header and only show gtk > >bugs if you go to gtkbugs.php.net. Likewise for pearbugs.php.net. Also > > Ugly hack. > > >makes it a hell of a lot easier to re-classify bugs that get filed in the > >wrong place. > > See above comment about multiple projects.. > > --Jani > >

« previous php.mirrors (#19012) next »