Re: Gabor resigns from the editor post
| From: | Gabor Hojtsy | Date: | Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:19:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Gabor resigns from the editor post | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.mirrors |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-30842@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>> So, as you can see there are a lot of repeated results. A simple
>>> solution is to search only for urls with /manual/$LANG/ on it.
>>
>> Not really. We encouraged users and search egines to get to know and
>> fall in love with our short URL scheme. Since search engines utilize URL
>> canonicalization and they end up with our short URL forms, restricting
>> searches only to the /manual/$LANG pattern would exclude a lot of manual
>> pages. We should rely on the fact that manual pages output a
>> Content-language HTTP header (which seems to be proper to me, Rasmus had
>> some reservations recently about them).
>
> I did? I don't recall that. But I am checking with the search gurus
> here on the best way to identify a page's language to the indexer. I
> have a feeling it isn't listening to this Content-Language header.
Maybe I did explained it badly. I was refering to this quote from you
(from yesterday):
| For this to work we really need to specify the language of the
| manual pages in a header at the top. Otherwise the search engine
| has to guess, or worse, we need to manually filter the results.
| We know the language when we generate the page, so it makes sense
| to tip off the search engine. Sometimes it is really hard for
| it to guess because a page may only have a couple of non-English
| words followed by lots of English in the notes.
If Content-language does not work, then it might be because the indexers
try to be smarter then the HTTP headers.
Goba