cvs: phpweb /license index.php

From: Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 01:17:07 +0000
Subject: cvs: phpweb /license index.php
Groups: php.mirrors 
Request: Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-4320@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
zeev Thu Mar 8 17:17:07 2001 EDT Modified files: /phpweb/license index.php Log: Fix bogus explanation Index: phpweb/license/index.php diff -u phpweb/license/index.php:1.2 phpweb/license/index.php:1.3 --- phpweb/license/index.php:1.2 Wed Mar 7 16:18:11 2001 +++ phpweb/license/index.php Thu Mar 8 17:17:07 2001 @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ <p><b>Q.</b> Why is PHP 4 not dual-licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) like PHP 3 was?</p> -<p><b>A.</b> Because PHP 4 uses the Zend scripting engine library, -which is under the QPL, and the developers of PHP chose to no longer -continue releasing our code under a dual-license scheme.</p> +<p><b>A.</b> GPL enforces many restrictions on what can and cannot +be done with the licensed code. The PHP developers decided to +release PHP under a much more loose license (BSD style), to help +PHP become as popular as possible.</p> <p><b>Q.</b> What does the PHP license mean then, in simple words?</p>

« previous php.mirrors (#4320) next »