note 107774 added to imagick.resizeimage

@jdhawk Yes it is true that using scaleImage is a lot faster than resizeImage but that's because it is using a very simple "chop" filter. This will be fine for small thumbnails but for anything larger it may introduce aliasing artifacts which you don't want. Thus it is not "more efficient" it is 'more simple'. If you want quality then you should use one of the slower (but better) filters. c.f. http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/resize/#scale ---- Server IP: 69.147.83.197 Probable Submitter: 82.152.19.97 ---- Manual Page -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/imagick.resizeimage.php Edit -- https://master.php.net/note/edit/107774 Del: integrated -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774/integrated Del: useless -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774/useless Del: bad code -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774/bad+code Del: spam -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774/spam Del: non-english -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774/non-english Del: in docs -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774/in+docs Del: other reasons-- https://master.php.net/note/delete/107774 Reject -- https://master.php.net/note/reject/107774 Search -- https://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php