note 107774 deleted from imagick.resizeimage by danbrown
| From: | danbrown@php.net | Date: | Thu, 10 May 2012 18:29:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 107774 deleted from imagick.resizeimage by danbrown | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.notes |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-187764@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Note Submitter: Spitfires
----
@jdhawk
Yes it is true that using scaleImage is a lot faster than resizeImage but that's because it is
using a very simple "chop" filter. This will be fine for small thumbnails but for
anything larger it may introduce aliasing artifacts which you don't want.
Thus it is not "more efficient" it is 'more simple'.
If you want quality then you should use one of the slower (but better) filters.
c.f. http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/resize/#scale