note 25439 added to ref.xml

Anyone care to comment on the functional differences between the precomplied XML extension and the PEAR XML package (http://pear.php.net/manual/en/packages.xml.php)? I'm assuming they are intended for the same purpose (i.e. defining XML tag behavior using PHP code/logic). I'm most curious about performance and usability differences. I'd expect that the expat-based extension would be faster, even if you were to cache/optimize the PEAR module. What are your thoughts? -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.xml.php http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=edit+25439 http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+25439 http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=reject+25439