Re: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:40:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pdo |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pdo+get-83@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 02.02.2008, at 03:39, Wez Furlong wrote:We can. I suggest focusing on PDO first and making sure that that works out, and then we can gradually move other extensions in this way.At the time we prepare a PHP release, we could then take the latest stable release from PECL for those drivers and put them into the "core" tarball (and compile them for the "core" zipfile).Can't we explore making this the default for all extensions? Also while we are at it, I know a number of PECL devs are complaining about various issues like the branching to maintain versions for different PHP minor versions etc.
IANAL, but it seems a number of additional rights granted by the PDO license could be folded into the PHP license. Also what cannot be folded into the PDO license, could maybe be put into an extended license (which would need to be allowed). This way the PDO drivers could be under the extended licensen maybe. Might make things even less problematic?Maybe. I don't object to this, but just wanted to say again that changing the PHP license is not an objective for PDO 2. --Wez.