²
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:39:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | ² | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.core |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-core+get-3616@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Klaus Guenther wrote:
On 8/16/2005 8:46 PM, Martin Jansen spake the following words:Any idea ? Arnaud.mj Tue Aug 16 14:46:21 2005 EDTYes, in that sense it's an improvement, but what about us poor QA people who just want to assign someone karma to make a release? The new solution is imho utterly unacceptable. It makes what used to be a simple process a huge deal. I don't like it at all. Or at least allow QA and admins to have the old interface :) For some reason we don't have karma anyway. I checked the code and it says isQA() for somehow it doesn't work.Added files: /pearweb/include/Damblan/Log Print.php Modified files: /pearweb/include pear-database.php /pearweb/public_html/admin package-maintainers.php Log:* Added a new interface for managing package maintainers. * Added a new logging observer to Damblan which simply prints log messages to the screen. # This new approach is necessary in order to make sure that the package.xml # files always contain the same maintainership information like the # database. It is probably not as nifty as the old one, but it's a real # improvement in terms of data integrity.