Re: Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-database.php /include/Damblan/Log Print.php /public_html/admin package-maintainers.php
| From: | Klaus Guenther | Date: | Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:17:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-database.php /include/Damblan/Log Print.php /public_html/admin package-maintainers.php | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.core |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-core+get-3715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 8/22/2005 12:12 PM, Pierre-Alain Joye spake the following words:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:51:19 +0200
> mj@php.net (Martin Jansen) wrote:
>
>
>>>Yes, in that sense it's an improvement, but what about us poor
>>>QA people who just want to assign someone karma to make a
>>>release?
>>
>>I'm not sure about the current state, but aren't QA people able
>>to roll releases without being a maintainer anyway?
As Pierre said, it's about assigning *new* karma, not so much about
rolling a release (and I'm not so 100% sure we're allowed to roll a
release without pearweb karma, though I vaguely remember Helgi
committing a patch for it).
> This has little to do with releases process in that case.
>
> You may like to be in the maintainer list (or new karma for
> that matter) at any point, regardless if you are listed or not in
> the latest release. You can then get the bugs mail for example.
You're right. However, once a release is made, the maintainer list will
be synced with the package.xml. So... someone would keep needing to be
assigned a role after each release. I like your reasoning, though, and
maybe it should be opened up... Dunno :)
Klaus