Re: Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-database.php /include/Damblan/Log Print.php /public_html/admin package-maintainers.php

From: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:17:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-database.php /include/Damblan/Log Print.php /public_html/admin package-maintainers.php
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.core 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-core+get-3715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 8/22/2005 12:12 PM, Pierre-Alain Joye spake the following words: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:51:19 +0200 > mj@php.net (Martin Jansen) wrote: > > >>>Yes, in that sense it's an improvement, but what about us poor >>>QA people who just want to assign someone karma to make a >>>release? >> >>I'm not sure about the current state, but aren't QA people able >>to roll releases without being a maintainer anyway? As Pierre said, it's about assigning *new* karma, not so much about rolling a release (and I'm not so 100% sure we're allowed to roll a release without pearweb karma, though I vaguely remember Helgi committing a patch for it). > This has little to do with releases process in that case. > > You may like to be in the maintainer list (or new karma for > that matter) at any point, regardless if you are listed or not in > the latest release. You can then get the bugs mail for example. You're right. However, once a release is made, the maintainer list will be synced with the package.xml. So... someone would keep needing to be assigned a role after each release. I like your reasoning, though, and maybe it should be opened up... Dunno :) Klaus

« previous php.pear.core (#3715) next »