Re: optiizer extension import?
| From: | George Schlossnagle | Date: | Mon, 04 Nov 2002 13:01:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: optiizer extension import? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-10470@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
While they certainly benefit from each other, you certainly recognize that they are separate facilities. If we're talking ideal situation they would both be in the core of the language and not have to be considered as extensions at all.
:)
george
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 03:52 AM, BUSTARRET, Jean-Francois wrote:
Nope. PHPA is both an optimizer and a bytecode cache. IMHO it would be preferable to have only one extensions handling both functions. Jean-François// Principal Consultant-----Message d'origine----- De : Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:sebastian@php.net] Envoyé : jeudi 31 octobre 2002 17:05 À : pear-dev@lists.php.net Objet : Re: [PEAR-DEV] optiizer extension import? "BUSTARRET, Jean-Francois" wrote:-- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php // George SchlossnagleIf it runs as fast as PHPA, if it's as easy to setup and if it's as stable, +1.You're mistaking an optimizer with a bytecode cache. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/ -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
// OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com// (c) 240.460.5234 (e) george@omniti.com // 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0