RE: [PEAR-DEV] an idea for get pear more exposure
| From: | Jan Schneider | Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:41:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] an idea for get pear more exposure | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-11663@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Zitat von Lukas Smith <smith@dybnet.de>:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wolfram Kriesing [mailto:lists@kriesing.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 12:56 PM
> > To: smith@dybnet.de
> > Cc: pear-dev@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] an idea for get pear more exposure
> >
> > Lukas Smith wrote:
> >
> > > How about the following?:
> > > [optionally] interface pearweb release system with freshmeat
> > >
> > > Every package manager would be able to choose if he wants his
> release
> > > announced no freshmeat as well. This way PEAR packages would get
> more
> > > exposure.
> > >
> > > Just a thought that I want to throw out there.
> >
> > cool idea.
> > i think we have to talk to the freshmeat guys, because they once
> > rejected a release of PEAR::Tree because i didnt release it as an
> > independent package, which was downloadable and able to run without
> > pear. (i think they said you release it on pear, so you have to
> anounce
> > it there)
> >
> > so i think that either
> > (1) the time will come once PEAR is installed with PHP by default and
> > packages that run based on PEAR become 'normal' or 'standard', so this
> > is no reason anymore for the freshmeat guys to reject packages
> > or
> > (2) every PEAR-package has to be able to run independently, which in
> my
> > eyes doesnt make much sense and is not possible anyway, and not meant
> to
> > be, i guess
> > or
> > (3) one can convince the freshmeat guys that PEAR-based packages are
> > 'allowed' to be announced on frehsmeat :-)
> >
> > anyway ... i think it would be great to arrange some kind of way to
> > announce pear packages on freshmeat
>
> well i have MDB on freshmeat ...
>
> anyways freshmeat can handle dependencies, so I see no reason why
> depending on other stuff is a problem.
Same with Horde and the applications that rely on it. The freshmeat guys are
probably happy if the dependency (PEAR) is also announced in freshmeat.
Jan.
--
http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project
http://www.ammma.de - discover your knowledge
http://www.tip4all.de - Deine private Tippgemeinschaft