Re: New class purposal: UrlParser
| From: | Sebastian Roebke | Date: | Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:32:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New class purposal: UrlParser | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-12289@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Roberto,
do you really think that merging both our classes into Net_URL would
actually make sense?
As our purpose is almost equal, I guess one of them merged would be enough.
I did not take a deeper look at how to best merge your or my class into it
yet, so if you have a solution for the resulting API already, go ahead and
keep us up-to-date ;-)
Best regards,
Sebastian Röbke
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto Bertó" <roberto@desenvolve.com.br>
To: "Sebastian Roebke" <sroebke@php.net>
Cc: "Kai Schröder" <mail@kaischroeder.net>; <pear-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] New class purposal: UrlParser
> Sebastian,
>
>
> What about we start add the URL Parser (and yours function) to NET_URL?
>
> We will not add to PEAR CVS but we can provide the diff to the authors.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 10:55, Sebastian Roebke wrote:
> > Hi Kai,
> >
> > the functionality our sources provide is meant to "translate"
configurable
> > parts of URLs into PHP variables, not "just" parsing an URL for its
> > different parts.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Sebastian Röbke
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kai Schröder" <mail@kaischroeder.net>
> > To: <pear-dev@lists.php.net>
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] New class purposal: UrlParser
> >
> >
> > > > I guess Sebastian class can be joined with my own class on NET_URL,
but
> > > > I need know if the Lead of NET_URL will appreceate this inclusion,
since
> > > > I will not work on something that will be denied again.
> > >
> > > What's the difference between your class and the bulidin function
> > parse_url
> > > (http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.parse-url.php)? If the
parse_url
> > > function can be better, why not changing in the c code (should be
faster
> > as
> > > PHP)?
> > >
> > > Regards, Kai
> --
>
>
>
>
> Atenciosamente,
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Roberto Berto - roberto@desenvolve.com.br
> Gerente de Contas / Desenvolve